Go vs Rust

Rust vs Go: A Maelstrom of Modern Tech

by

Rust and Go (Golang) are two popular languages among developers and a source of debate on which language is better suited for specific use cases. Both prioritize performance, safety, and concurrency, but their design philosophies and ecosystems differ significantly. This article explores key considerations like performance, web development, blockchain, and microservices, helping you decide which language aligns with your project’s needs.

Rust vs Go Performance

When it comes to raw performance, Rust has a slight edge over Go due to its focus on memory safety and performance. According to a benchmarking study by the Rust project team, Rust’s performance is comparable to C++’s, while Go’s performance is more in line with Java’s.

  • Rust: Known for its zero-cost abstractions and fine-grained memory management (via ownership and borrowing), Rust achieves C/C++-level performance. It compiles to native machine code and has no runtime overhead, making it ideal for latency-sensitive tasks like game engines or embedded systems. However, its steep learning curve can slow development initially.
  • Go: Go’s performance is competitive for a garbage-collected language. Its lightweight goroutines (managed by a built-in scheduler) enable efficient concurrency, but the GC can introduce micro-pauses. While Go’s runtime is faster than Python or Ruby, it generally lags behind Rust in raw throughput.

A TechEmpower benchmark comparing web frameworks ranks Rust’s Actix and Rocket higher than Go’s Gin or Echo in raw requests per second. However, Go’s simplicity often balances this gap in practice.

Go vs Rust for Web Development

Both languages are popular for backend services, but their approaches differ:

  • Go: Go’s standard library includes robust HTTP tools, and frameworks like Gin and Echo simplify API development. Its fast compile times and GC reduce cognitive load, making it a favorite for rapid prototyping and scalable microservices (e.g., Uber and Twitch). See Uber’s GO repository at github.
  • Rust: Rust’s Actix Web and Rocket frameworks offer exceptional performance and safety guarantees, but strict compile-time checks can slow iteration. Startups like Figma use Rust for performance-critical components, while others leverage Go for developer velocity.

For most web projects, Go’s simplicity shines, but Rust is preferable where memory safety and raw speed are non-negotiable.

Rust and Golang in Blockchain Development

Blockchain projects demand security, concurrency, and efficiency.

  • Rust: Dominates in smart contract platforms (e.g., Solana, Polkadot) due to its memory safety and low-level control. Its no_std mode allows running in resource-constrained environments, ideal for consensus algorithms.
  • Go: Used in blockchain infrastructure (e.g., Hyperledger Fabric, Cosmos SDK) for its concurrency model and ease of building distributed networks. Go’s simplicity accelerates node implementation and maintenance.

Rust is favored for writing secure smart contracts, while Go excels in network layer development.

Rust vs Go for Microservices

Microservices require scalability, fault tolerance, and ease of deployment.

  • Go: Go’s goroutines and channels simplify concurrent workflows, and its minimalistic binaries (with static linking) are easy to containerize. Companies like Docker and Kubernetes rely on Go for its developer-friendly toolchain.
  • Rust: While Rust’s async/await model offers high throughput, its complexity can hinder productivity. It’s best for microservices requiring extreme performance (e.g., real-time analytics) or integration with hardware.

For most teams, Go’s productivity wins, but Rust is a strong contender for performance-critical services.

Conclusion

  • Choose Rust for performance-critical systems, memory safety, and low-level control (e.g., blockchain, game engines).
  • Choose Go for rapid development, scalable web services, and maintainable microservices.

Both languages are here to stay. Companies like Dropbox and Discord use Rust and Golang together, leveraging their complementary strengths. Your choice depends on your team’s expertise and project requirements. Interested in comparing GO with Kotlin see this article.